![]() | ||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 08:10:39PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >>We're actually doing the converse of this in the sched-domain > >>scheduler. Processes have a tendancy to follow the interrupts > >>(ie. try to get onto the same CPU as them). > > > > > >Hmm? I don't see any code in sched-domain that would care about > >interrupts. What I'm missing? > > > > Well no, what I should have said is wakeups. We do the same > for all wakeups, so there is nothing interrupt specific you > are right. wakeups are too late e.g. for network processing. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||||