lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for AMD64?
From
Date
On Don, 2004-05-27 at 07:13, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Why do you think you need in-kernel irq balancing?

Very good question indeed, why is it there for the i386 architecture at
all?

I just don't like the idea of unnecessary branching for the AMD64
architecture increasing maintenance and testing affords and thereby
generating less maintained and tested code.

> Does userspace irqbalanced not work for you?

Seems to work, just like the i386 irqbalanced before it has been
obsoleted by CONFIG_IRQBALANCE

Tom

--
T h o m a s Z e h e t b a u e r ( TZ251 )
PGP encrypted mail preferred - KeyID 96FFCB89
finger thomasz@hostmaster.org for key

Press any key to continue or any other key to quit.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans