[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: why swap at all?
On May 26, 2004, at 12:58, John Bradford wrote:
>> A lot of people feel subjectively that swap makes a system slow.
>> There's
>> anecdotal evidence that swap does horrible things or "must be badly
>> broken
>> because the machine gets slow" on almost every operating system that
>> supports swapping. In most cases, it's just a case where the real
>> working
>> set has exceeded physical memory, and in that case, swap is just
>> doing what
>> it's supposed to be doing.
> It's true that physical RAM or swap, over and above the minimum needed
> for
> the working set is usually beneficial. However where there is
> physical RAM
> which will never be touched during normal usage, adding swap will not
> be
> beneficial.

If your RAM happens to be large enough to contain not only everything
on disk
you ever want to even read *and* all the space you need for
calculations, then
you have nothing to gain from using swap. On the other hand, if you
are say,
grepping through a kernel source tree, the first time it is read from
disk, but after
that it is stored in cache in your RAM. If you have swap, anonymous
pages of
RAM that are not in use can be paged out while you do your grepping,
even if
you are grepping through a 900MB+ dataset and only have 1GB RAM. Swap
allows non-filesystem-backed pages to be pushed to disk for some
backed pages to be loaded and used.

Kyle Moffett

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.106 / U:0.768 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site