[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: why swap at all?
    On May 26, 2004, at 12:58, John Bradford wrote:
    >> A lot of people feel subjectively that swap makes a system slow.
    >> There's
    >> anecdotal evidence that swap does horrible things or "must be badly
    >> broken
    >> because the machine gets slow" on almost every operating system that
    >> supports swapping. In most cases, it's just a case where the real
    >> working
    >> set has exceeded physical memory, and in that case, swap is just
    >> doing what
    >> it's supposed to be doing.
    > It's true that physical RAM or swap, over and above the minimum needed
    > for
    > the working set is usually beneficial. However where there is
    > physical RAM
    > which will never be touched during normal usage, adding swap will not
    > be
    > beneficial.

    If your RAM happens to be large enough to contain not only everything
    on disk
    you ever want to even read *and* all the space you need for
    calculations, then
    you have nothing to gain from using swap. On the other hand, if you
    are say,
    grepping through a kernel source tree, the first time it is read from
    disk, but after
    that it is stored in cache in your RAM. If you have swap, anonymous
    pages of
    RAM that are not in use can be paged out while you do your grepping,
    even if
    you are grepping through a 900MB+ dataset and only have 1GB RAM. Swap
    allows non-filesystem-backed pages to be pushed to disk for some
    backed pages to be loaded and used.

    Kyle Moffett

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.022 / U:5.900 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site