![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Duncan Sands wrote: > > However I have seen buggy code where spin_lock_irq() was issued with > > interrupts disabled. [...] > > Some time ago I sent a patch to lkml that tests for this [1]. > And guess what - it happens all over the place [2]. Also, the > scheduler often gets called with interrupts disabled (schedule() > does spin_lock_irq), but the cases I checked all turned out to be > OK [3]. Perhaps it is more problematic now? I'll run with the debug code and audit any suspect ones. The ones mentioned below all seem ok. > [1] http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2003/May/5585.html > [2] http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2003/May/5842.html > [3] http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2003/May/5581.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||