[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Add FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE futex op
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 01:12:03AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek <> wrote:
> >
> > That said, NPTL can deal with any of these variants and the decision
> > is up to Martin I think (assuming the base patch gets accepted, that is).
> Well the race is real and does need a kernel fix, so I queued it up. I
> guess if the new argument to sys_futex() breaks some architecture they can
> independently add a new syscall for it, or send a fix. Mutter.
> It's a bit of a shame that you need to be a rocket scientist to
> understand the futex syscall interface. Bert, are you still maintaining
> the manpage? If so, is there enough info here to update it?

The latest futex(2) or futex(4) manpage I saw doesn't mention FUTEX_REQUEUE
at all.
Also, any futex man page should probably SEE ALSO Ulrich's futex paper:
which helps understanding how to successfully use futexes, because
it is certainly not trivial.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.075 / U:2.928 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site