[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Add FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE futex op
    On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 01:12:03AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > Jakub Jelinek <> wrote:
    > >
    > > That said, NPTL can deal with any of these variants and the decision
    > > is up to Martin I think (assuming the base patch gets accepted, that is).
    > Well the race is real and does need a kernel fix, so I queued it up. I
    > guess if the new argument to sys_futex() breaks some architecture they can
    > independently add a new syscall for it, or send a fix. Mutter.
    > It's a bit of a shame that you need to be a rocket scientist to
    > understand the futex syscall interface. Bert, are you still maintaining
    > the manpage? If so, is there enough info here to update it?

    The latest futex(2) or futex(4) manpage I saw doesn't mention FUTEX_REQUEUE
    at all.
    Also, any futex man page should probably SEE ALSO Ulrich's futex paper:
    which helps understanding how to successfully use futexes, because
    it is certainly not trivial.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.035 / U:14.444 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site