lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Minutes from 5/19 CKRM/PAGG discussion
Hubertus Franke wrote:
>
> One important input the PAGG team could give is some real
> examples where actually multiple associations to different groups
> is required and help us appreciate that position and let us
> see how this would/could be done in CKRM.

One example would be the implementation of CPU sets (or pools) a la
Solaris where there are named CPU pools to which processors and
processes are assigned. Processors can be moved between CPU pools and
when this happens it is necessary to visit all the processes that are
assigned to the pools involved (one losing and one gaining the
processor) and change their CPU affinity masks to reflect the new
assignment of processors. PAGG would be ideal for implementing this.

At the same time, a resource management client could be controlling
resources allocated to processes based on some other criteria such as
the real user or the application being run without regard to which CPU
pool they are running in.

Peter
--
Dr Peter Williams, Chief Scientist peterw@aurema.com
Aurema Pty Limited Tel:+61 2 9698 2322
PO Box 305, Strawberry Hills NSW 2012, Australia Fax:+61 2 9699 9174
79 Myrtle Street, Chippendale NSW 2008, Australia http://www.aurema.com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.425 / U:0.928 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site