lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.6-mm5 oops mounting ext3 or reiserfs with -o barrier
On Sun, May 23 2004, Lorenzo Allegrucci wrote:
> On Sunday 23 May 2004 17:45, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Sun, May 23 2004, Lorenzo Allegrucci wrote:
> > > On Sunday 23 May 2004 12:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > Here's a rolled up updated version that tries to get async notification
> > > > of missing barrier support working as well. reiser currently doesn't
> > > > cope with that correctly (fails mount), ext3 seems to but gets stuck.
> > > > Andrew has that fixed already, I think :-)
> > > >
> > > > Lorenzo, can you test this on top of 2.6.6-mm5?
> > >
> > > Problem fixed, but there is some performance regression
> > >
> > > ext3 (default)
> > > untar read copy remove
> > > 0m53.861s 0m24.942s 1m30.164s 0m20.664s
> > > 0m7.132s 0m1.191s 0m0.766s 0m0.076s
> > > 0m5.807s 0m3.345s 0m9.996s 0m1.719s
> > >
> > > ext3 (-o barrier=1)
> > > untar read copy remove
> > > 0m52.117s 0m28.502s 1m51.153s 0m25.561s
> > > 0m7.231s 0m1.209s 0m0.738s 0m0.071s
> > > 0m6.117s 0m3.191s 0m9.347s 0m1.635s
> >
> > Not sure what you mean here
>
> Untar, read, copy and remove the OpenOffice tarball, each test
> run with cold cache (mount/umount cycle).

I understand that, I just don't see how you can call it a regression.
It's a given that barrier will be slower.

> > but yes of course -o barrier=1 is going to
> > be slower than default + write back caching. What you should compare is
> > without barrier support and hdparm -W0 /dev/hdX, if -o barrier=1 with
> > caching on is slower then that's a regression :-)
>
> hdparm -W0 /dev/hda
>
> ext3 (-o barrier=0)
> untar read copy remove
> 1m55.190s 0m27.633s 2m19.072s 0m21.348s
> 0m7.081s 0m1.189s 0m0.724s 0m0.083s
> 0m6.502s 0m3.244s 0m9.715s 0m1.633s
>
> ext3 (-o barrier=1)
> untar read copy remove
> 1m55.358s 0m23.831s 2m16.674s 0m21.508s
> 0m7.153s 0m1.200s 0m0.748s 0m0.087s
> 0m6.775s 0m3.358s 0m9.985s 0m1.781s
>
>
> haparm -W1 /dev/hda
>
> ext3 (-o barrier=0)
> untar read copy remove
> 0m55.405s 0m26.230s 1m28.765s 0m20.766s
> 0m7.195s 0m1.199s 0m0.773s 0m0.081s
> 0m6.502s 0m3.359s 0m9.672s 0m1.868s
>
> ext3 (-o barrier=1)
> untar read copy remove
> 0m52.117s 0m28.502s 1m51.153s 0m25.561s
> 0m7.231s 0m1.209s 0m0.738s 0m0.071s
> 0m6.117s 0m3.191s 0m9.347s 0m1.635s

Your results look a bit over the map, how many runs are your averaging
for each one?

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.117 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site