[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: scheduler: IRQs disabled over context switches
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 04:04:39PM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2004, Russell King wrote:
> > Not quite - look harder. They use spin_unlock_irq in finish_arch_switch
> > rather than prepare_arch_switch.
> Hmm, they do indeed. Hmm, if we release the rq lock before the ctx switch,
> "prev" (the real one) will result not running since we already set
> "rq->curr" to "next" (and we do not hold "prev->switch_lock").

We do hold prev->switch_lock - we hold it all the time that the thread
is running. Consider what prepare_arch_switch() is doing - it's taking
the next threads switch_lock. It only gets released _after_ we've
switched away from that thread.

So I think your analysis is flawed.

Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux -
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA -
2.6 Serial core
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.067 / U:5.356 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site