Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 16 May 2004 08:58:58 +0100 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: MMUless CPU support? |
| |
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 06:39:22PM +0900, Hyok S. Choi wrote: > >And you can use assembler/linker magic to alias sys_fork to > >sys_ni_syscall. > > > >Since Hyok seems to be 100% against any kind of merge, it's useless > >even talking about this though. > > > > > Hmm, I think about the clean and well structured kind of merge. His > comment was useful for me. :-) > > I always think almost all of tricky method to cross among codes is NO > good, for maintainer, code readers, porting guys and all. > I like Vadim's method.
Where does this totally out of context post come from? Given rmk is Cc'ed it's probably armnommu and you're probably still arguing that you don't want to merge the remaining tiny nommu bitws into arch/arm?
A bit more context would certainly help.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |