lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 13 May 2004 22:04:15 -0700
FromChris Wright <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] capabilities, take 3 (Re: [PATCH] capabilites, take 2)
* Andy Lutomirski (luto@myrealbox.com) wrote:
> As for Posix caps, is there any good reason to follow Posix?  I
> don't know of any OS that has Posix caps except Linux, and they're
> broken.  The spec was dropped, anyway.

Well, I wonder what IRIX does?  They support capabilities and had a
reasonable sized hand in the draft.  No point in making it impossible
to port apps.  It's not that I'm a strong fan of Posix caps, but
compatibility (even with a partially complete draft) with defacto
standards is not entirely unreasonable.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2008