lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: dentry bloat.
    On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:14:33AM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
    > > so I guess you do.
    >
    > Sorry - I'm being thick.
    >
    > Is the new hashing good or bad?

    That I don't know from the contradicting descriptions, but...

    > (Usually, performance is thought of as something 'good', so when you say
    > it is 'brought down', that sounds 'bad', but since it's ms/iteration,
    > I'm guessing that you mean to say that the ms/iteration is lower, which
    > would I guess improves performance, so I'm guessing that bringing
    > performance down is 'good' in this case, which is not idiomatic to the
    > particular version of English I happen to speak ... So please favor

    In this case, the performance is inversely proportional to the
    benchmark metric. Lower benchmark metric means better performance.

    Thanks
    Dipankar
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:3.464 / U:0.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site