lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: dentry bloat.
> so I guess you do.

Sorry - I'm being thick.

Is the new hashing good or bad?

(Usually, performance is thought of as something 'good', so when you say
it is 'brought down', that sounds 'bad', but since it's ms/iteration,
I'm guessing that you mean to say that the ms/iteration is lower, which
would I guess improves performance, so I'm guessing that bringing
performance down is 'good' in this case, which is not idiomatic to the
particular version of English I happen to speak ... So please favor
this poor old brain of mine and state outright whether the new hash is
good or bad. Does the new hash makes performance better or worse?)

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.099 / U:0.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site