![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 06:17:09PM +0200, Vadim Lebedev wrote: > > >>Hyok, >> >>about fork and mmap syscalls on uClinux: >> >>actually i believe it would be better to leave calls.S untouched and return >>EINVAL or similar in the C level code... >>BTW, if i remember correctly (it was in 97 when i've ported uClinux 2.0.xx >>from 68000 to ARM7) mmap call was partially functionnal on ucLinux >>(depending >>on arguments) so >> there is no need to scrap it from calls.S too.... >> >>the less we touch .S file the eathier it'll be to maintain the NO-MMU >>version >> >> > >And you can use assembler/linker magic to alias sys_fork to >sys_ni_syscall. > >Since Hyok seems to be 100% against any kind of merge, it's useless >even talking about this though. > > Hmm, I think about the clean and well structured kind of merge. His comment was useful for me. :-) I always think almost all of tricky method to cross among codes is NO good, for maintainer, code readers, porting guys and all. I like Vadim's method. Regards, Hyok - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||