Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 14 May 2004 10:48:27 -0700 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] capabilites, take 2 |
| |
* Albert Cahalan (albert@users.sourceforge.net) wrote: > This would be an excellent time to reconsider how capabilities > are assigned to bits. You're breaking things anyway; you might > as well do all the breaking at once. I want local-use bits so > that the print queue management access isn't by magic UID/GID. > We haven't escaped UID-as-priv if server apps and setuid apps > are still making UID-based access control decisions.
This is too volatile in stable series.
thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |