[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Fastboot] Re: [announce] kexec for linux 2.6.6
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 05:30:52AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 04:16:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > But if we need additional infrastructure to "add new syscalls via VDSO" then
> > this should be in the base kernel, even if it's empty, yes?
> Linus has vetoed dynamic syscall registration a few times. And I agree
> with him, dynamic syscalls are the best way to get completely crappy
> interfaces.

And why not definitely assign sort of a "multiplexed syscall" entry,
a la sys_socketcall() ? It could be shared by lots of non-mainline projects
and have a greater chance of being stable along the time.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.069 / U:7.836 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site