![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 12 May 2004 23:45:38 -0700 Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 23:35, Keiichiro Tokunaga wrote: > > LHNS is focusing on "container device hotplug". Container device > > could contain CPUs, memory, and/or IO devices. Container device > > could contain only IO devices. In this case, LHNS cannot use > > $NODED/control/online (NUMA stuff) for the container device. > > So, why not expose your containers in the same way that all of the other > NUMA node information is exported? What makes your NUMA containers > different from all of the other flavors of NUMA implementations in > Linux? > > > By the way, what happen when you issue > > "echo 0 > $NODEDIR/control/online"? Can you detach it > > from the system after echo-ing? > > Well, since it doesn't exist yet... Sure :) The same way as you described in your previous email seems work for a container device if we have $CONTAINERD/online. Anyway, I feel we need to be more specific about implementation. Is there already any information that I can access? Thanks, Kei - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||