![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 03:35:23PM +0530, Maneesh Soni wrote: > On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 03:25:49PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 11:09:08AM +0530, Maneesh Soni wrote: > > > > > > Greg, Are the patches fit for inclusion? I need to know this as my sysfs backing > > > store patches are taking back seats because of these changes, particulary the > > > one in second patch :-(. > > > > I'm awash in different patches from you. Can you try sending me the > > ones you think are good enough for inclusion right now? We can work > > from there. > > > > Sorry Greg, for confusing you by sending multiple copies. Here we are talking > about two patches which cleans up the kobject_set_name() usuage in the routines > as mentioned below. The first one is appended here and the second one in the > next mail. I have complied and tested (booting) both the patches and hope they > are good for inclusion. > > > 1) kobject_set_name-cleanup-01.patch > > This patch corrects the following by checking the reutrn code from > kobject_set_name(). > > bus_add_driver() > bus_register() > sys_dev_register() Ok, I applied this patch (it needed some manual messing with due to some other patches in this area by others.) thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||