lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 11 May 2004 16:32:07 -0700
FromGreg KH <>
SubjectRe: [RFC 1/2] kobject_set_name - error handling
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 03:35:23PM +0530, Maneesh Soni wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 03:25:49PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 11:09:08AM +0530, Maneesh Soni wrote:
> > > 
> > > Greg, Are the patches fit for inclusion? I need to know this as my sysfs backing
> > > store patches are taking back seats because of these changes, particulary the
> > > one in second patch :-(.
> > 
> > I'm awash in different patches from you.  Can you try sending me the
> > ones you think are good enough for inclusion right now?  We can work
> > from there.
> > 
> 
> Sorry Greg, for confusing you by sending multiple copies. Here we are talking 
> about two patches which cleans up the kobject_set_name() usuage in the routines
> as mentioned below. The first one is appended here and the second one in the 
> next mail. I have complied and tested (booting) both the patches and hope they 
> are good for inclusion.
> 
> 
> 1) kobject_set_name-cleanup-01.patch
> 
> This patch corrects the following by checking the reutrn code from 
> kobject_set_name().
> 
> bus_add_driver()
> bus_register()
> sys_dev_register()

Ok, I applied this patch (it needed some manual messing with due to some
other patches in this area by others.)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2008