lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fix dev_printk to work even in the absence of am attached driver
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 09:00:47AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 17:07, Greg KH wrote:
> > But doesn't this cause the string "(unbound)" to be created for every
> > dev_printk() call in the code? I don't think gcc can optimize that very
> > well. How about making a global string just for that, otherwise the
> > size police will come after me for adding such a patch :)
>
> OK, I can't find an elegant way of making it global, so I think the best
> thing to do is just leave it blank for no driver (gcc can optimise that
> case).

Ok, I can live with this, thanks. Applied.

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.037 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site