Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] really-ptrace-single-step | From | Fabiano Ramos <> | Date | Tue, 11 May 2004 15:40:02 -0300 |
| |
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 14:38, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Tue, 11 May 2004, Fabiano Ramos wrote: > > > It would not work against 2.6.5, since > > > > do_syscall_trace() > > > > makes the check > > > > if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) > > return; > > > > Simply removing it would do? > > No no. You need to OR it with the single-step. Try: > > if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) && > !test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP)) > return; > > > - Davide
Still not working. :( Correct me if I am wrong: is TIF_SINGLESTEP asserted whenever a process is being singlestepped? I do not see where it is done.
> > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |