![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Monday 10 of May 2004 23:13, you wrote: > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Rene, can you test these (incremental) patches? > > > > + if (drive->usage != 1) > > + return 0; > > Only this one does not make a change. > > > - if (drive->usage != 1) > > + if (drive->usage != 1 || !drive->removable) Thanks. Rene, can you send me copies of /proc/ide/hda/identify and /proc/ide/hdc/identify? I still would like to know why these drives don't accept flush cache commands (or it is a driver's bug?). > With this one, the cache flushing noise is no more, but still a problem > unfortunately. With or without these patches, 2.6.6 powers down the > drive during reboot. This is very annoying, seeing as how it immediately > needs to spin up again for POST. There is a problem with new 2.6 generic ->shutdown framework, it doesn't differentiate between reboot / halt and power_off. We may try to fix it or revert to 2.4 way of doing things if this is too big change for 2.6. Thanks, Bartlomiej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||