lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: dentry bloat.
From
Date
On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 10:27, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
>
> >One also wonders about whether all the RCU stuff is needed on UP. I'm
> >not sure if I grok all the finepoints here, but it looks like the
> >answer is no and that we can make struct_rcu head empty and have
> >call_rcu fall directly through to the callback. This would save
> >something like 16-32 bytes (32/64bit), not to mention a bunch of
> >dinking around with lists and whatnot.
> >
> >So what am I missing?
> >
> >
> Preempt can happen anytime, I believe.

ok so for UP-non-preempt we can still get those 16 bytes back from the
dentry....

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:1.793 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site