![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Trond Myklebust wrote: > So why do you think that is inconsistent with my statement: "the > permissions checking has to be done by the server, period"? I see it wasn't clear from my reply. I don't disagree at all. Permission checking is the server's job. Clients are untrusted. > This should be entirely consistent with local file behaviour. > Particularly since the code to deal with the read-only mount option in > nfs_permission() was pretty much cut-n-pasted from vfs_permission(). The original poster said it didn't work for him on an NFSv3 mount. Looking at nfs_permission() I (of course) agree it looks innocent enough. -- Ciao, Pascal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||