![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 10:44, Paul Jackson wrote: > Several architectures have this large version of find_next_bit() code. > > It may well make sense for the O(1) scheduler to be inlining this. Why? -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||