[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: drivers/char/dz.[ch]: reason for keeping?
    On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:16:48PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
    > On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
    > > Old ./drivers/char/dz.c + VAX changes + SERIO changes, that is :) I
    > > guess best practice is that VAX people first merge up with MIPS folks,
    > > then we snatch the old driver together and have a beer...
    > It sounds like a plan. :-)

    Sorry for coming in late on this.

    There is no problem with dropping drivers/char/dz.[ch] from the official
    tree. Us Linux/VAX guys work off our own CVS tree on SourceForge, so we
    can continue to carry the drivers/char/dz.[ch] until we've got the
    new driver working.

    So, Jan-Benedict, there is no major panic to get the new driver working
    for us before Rusty/Linus remove the old one.

    Kenn (another Linux/VAX guy)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.020 / U:0.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site