[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: drivers/char/dz.[ch]: reason for keeping?
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:16:48PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > Old ./drivers/char/dz.c + VAX changes + SERIO changes, that is :) I
> > guess best practice is that VAX people first merge up with MIPS folks,
> > then we snatch the old driver together and have a beer...
> It sounds like a plan. :-)

Sorry for coming in late on this.

There is no problem with dropping drivers/char/dz.[ch] from the official
tree. Us Linux/VAX guys work off our own CVS tree on SourceForge, so we
can continue to carry the drivers/char/dz.[ch] until we've got the
new driver working.

So, Jan-Benedict, there is no major panic to get the new driver working
for us before Rusty/Linus remove the old one.

Kenn (another Linux/VAX guy)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.057 / U:3.388 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site