lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromPeter Chubb <>
DateWed, 7 Apr 2004 14:29:13 +1000
SubjectRe: kernel stack challenge
>>>>> "Horst" == Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl> writes:

>> The only one is that performance would suffer because of use of
>> higher level language than C or Assembler.

Horst> Because the performance and size of kernel code is _critical_,
Horst> maybe?  Because much of the kernel code has been carefully
Horst> tuned for maximum performance perhaps?

>> There is a reason people use languages like PERL, Java and so on.

Horst> And there are solid reasons for _not_ writing operating system
Horst> kernels in them too...

Hey, why not just port Xemacs to run on the bare metal.  That way you
get a lisp interpreter `for free'.  :-)
--
Dr Peter Chubb  http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au  peterc AT gelato.unsw.edu.au
The technical we do immediately,  the political takes *forever*


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [from the cache]
©2003-2008