lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 7 Apr 2004 07:44:03 +0100
From viro@parcelfa ...
SubjectRe: [Patch] BME, noatime and nodiratime
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 12:35:06AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> I believe its so that we update the data in the cache, and avoid writing
> it back to disk unnecessarily - consider the case where you have a lot
> of tty activity (which updates atime).  You don't particularly want to
> be committing atime updates to disk every, what, 5 seconds, or performing
> the NFS operations for the same.

OK, but at least we want to dirty the inode at some point (e.g. final
close), so that atime would be monotonous - as it is, we get it reset
when inode goes out of cache and is reread again...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [from the cache]
©2003-2008