Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Apr 2004 16:07:07 +0200 | From | Dan Aloni <> | Subject | Re: [coLinux-devel] coLinux benchmarks |
| |
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:45:49AM -0400, Ian C. Blenke wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 12:22:56AM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 01:11:39PM -0700, Eyal Lotem wrote: > > > > > I think the reason may be that Windows is using the > > > disks better and making access faster. Perhaps DMA > > > acceleration or some other feature is turned off on > > > the Linux host side, making disk access slower on the > > > Linux side. > > > > No Windows was involved with these benchmarks in any way. I ran > > coLinux on Linux. > > You ran coLinux on a Linux host? Perhaps I've missed something on the list.. > is there a native Linux kernel port now? An alternative to User Mode Linux > is a rather big thing for me.
Yes, it's an alternative to User Mode Linux, thought it's a bit early and doesn't have all the wide range of support tools and nifty stuff that UML has.
-- Dan Aloni da-x@colinux.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |