[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [coLinux-devel] coLinux benchmarks
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:45:49AM -0400, Ian C. Blenke wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 12:22:56AM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 01:11:39PM -0700, Eyal Lotem wrote:
> >
> > > I think the reason may be that Windows is using the
> > > disks better and making access faster. Perhaps DMA
> > > acceleration or some other feature is turned off on
> > > the Linux host side, making disk access slower on the
> > > Linux side.
> >
> > No Windows was involved with these benchmarks in any way. I ran
> > coLinux on Linux.
> You ran coLinux on a Linux host? Perhaps I've missed something on the list..
> is there a native Linux kernel port now? An alternative to User Mode Linux
> is a rather big thing for me.

Yes, it's an alternative to User Mode Linux, thought it's a bit
early and doesn't have all the wide range of support tools and
nifty stuff that UML has.

Dan Aloni
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.055 / U:2.308 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site