[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Process Aggregates (PAGG) support for the 2.6 kernel
    On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 11:22:49AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
    > > Again, pagg doesn't even play in that league. It's really just a tiny
    > > meachnism to allow a kernel module keep per-process data. Policies like
    > > process-groups can be implemented on top of that.
    > So basically you're arguing that PAGG is better because it
    > doesn't do what's needed ? ;)

    I told you a bunch of times that's it's a different thing. Simply keeping
    per-process state might be a useful building block for some monster resource
    whatever fuckup, but certainly not the other way around.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.021 / U:20.296 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site