[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Process Aggregates (PAGG) support for the 2.6 kernel
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 11:22:49AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Again, pagg doesn't even play in that league. It's really just a tiny
> > meachnism to allow a kernel module keep per-process data. Policies like
> > process-groups can be implemented on top of that.
> So basically you're arguing that PAGG is better because it
> doesn't do what's needed ? ;)

I told you a bunch of times that's it's a different thing. Simply keeping
per-process state might be a useful building block for some monster resource
whatever fuckup, but certainly not the other way around.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.367 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site