[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ~500 megs cached yet 2.6.5 goes into swap hell
Andrew wrote:
> Even if the background activity was clamped to just a few megs
> of cache you'll find that the seek activity is a killer, and
> needs a limitation mechanism.

True - the seek activity is another critical resource that would need to
be throttled to keep updatedb/backup from interferring with my late
night labours.

Let's see, that's:
1) cpu scheduling ticks
2) memory for virtual address backing store
3) memory for file related caching
4) disk arm motion

Hmmm ... actually not so much a numa-placement extension, but rather a
CKRM opportunity.

CKRM focuses on measuring and restraining how much of specified critical
resources a task is using; numa placement on which cpus or memory nodes
are allowed to be used at all.

See further the CKRM thread of Shailabh Nagar, also running on lkml

I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <> 1.650.933.1373
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.132 / U:0.912 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site