lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license (-> possible GPL violation :)
    On Tue, 2004-04-27 13:59:48 +0100, Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com>
    wrote in message <408E5944.8090807@grupopie.com>:
    > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
    > >This way, the module format doesn't change, but we can do additional
    > >verification in the loader.
    >
    > The way I see it, they know a C string ends with a '\0'. This is like
    > saying that a English sentence ends with a dot. If they wrote "GPL\0" they
    > are effectively saying that the license *is* GPL period.
    >
    > So, where the source code? :)

    That's another (quite amusing:) point of view. Anybody willing to ask a
    lawyer?

    MfG, JBG

    --
    Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481
    "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
    fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak!
    ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.021 / U:150.568 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site