[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] 2.6.6-rc2 Allow architectures to reenable interrupts on contended spinlocks
    On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 21:49:52 -0700, 
    Andrew Morton <> wrote:
    >Keith Owens <> wrote:
    >> Enable interrupts while waiting for a disabled spinlock, but only if
    >> interrupts were enabled before issuing spin_lock_irqsave(). It makes a
    >> measurable difference to interrupt servicing on large systems.
    >Do you know which are the offending locks?

    Workload dependent. We already service interrupts while waiting for a
    non-disabled spinlock. The patch allows a cpu to do some useful work
    and service interrupts while waiting for disabled spinlocks as well.

    >How much difference, and how large are the systems?

    From memory (September 2003) 3-5% improvement on an AIM7 run, with 64

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.019 / U:17.544 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site