[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: I oppose Chris and Jeff's patch to add an unnecessary additional namespace to ReiserFS
    On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Chris Mason wrote:

    > I hope v4 does improve the xattr api, and I hope it manages to do so for
    > more then just reiser4. It is important that application writers are
    > able to code to a single interface and get coverage across all the major
    > linux filesystems.

    Interesting point, given that SuSE were early adopters of alternative
    file systems such as JFS, ReiserFS, and XFS (in lexicographical order
    rather than order of appearance). These have always diversified the
    semantics offered, not only in adding features that other systems didn't
    have, but also in omitting features the other file systems did have -
    chattr, for instance, or tail merging that confused boot loaders, for

    With respect to Hans's reasoning about name spaces, is there an official
    standard that mandates a particular API for the ACL stuff ("POSIX")?

    If so, the whole discussion is about getting out of the frying pan and
    into the fire. The traditional approach will then be standards compliant
    but be out-of-band and outside of the file system name space, the new
    approach will be outside of the standards, requiring application
    developers to produce a Linux and a POSIX version.

    Or am I barking up the wrong tree?

    Matthias Andree

    Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.020 / U:0.180 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site