lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 23 Apr 2004 23:28:37 +1200
FromAndrew McGregor <>
SubjectRe: [somewhat OT] binary modules agaaaain
And it must, if only because there are laws that require some device 
drivers to be binary only.

I kid you not, take a look at the FCC software radio rules.  Some wireless 
cards fall into their definition.

Wierd world, but there we go...

Andrew

--On Tuesday, 20 April 2004 5:08 p.m. +0200 Guennadi Liakhovetski 
<gl@dsa-ac.de> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
>> > A binary module is "considered good" if
>>
>> This is a false assumption IMO no binary only modules can be "good".
>
> I agree! That was just an idea to make Linux life easier __if__ it
> __must__ live with binary modules.
>
> Thanks
> Guennadi
> ---------------------------------
> Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
> DSA Daten- und Systemtechnik GmbH
> Pascalstr. 28
> D-52076 Aachen
> Germany
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>



---------
Andrew McGregor
Director, Scientific Advisor
IndraNet Technologies Ltd
http://www.indranet-technologies.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [from the cache]
©2003-2008