[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here...
    > > > Unless i misunderstood: You need someone/thing to see about 64K
    > > > packets within a single flow to make the predicition so the attack
    > > > is succesful. Sure to have access to such capability is to be in a
    > > > hostile path, no? ;->
    > > No, you do not need to see any packet.
    > >
    > Ok, so i misunderstood then. How do you predict the sequences without
    > seeing any packet? Is there any URL to mentioned paper?
    You don't - just brute-force the tcp 4-tuple and sequence number. The
    attack relies on the fact that you don't have to match sequence number
    exactly, which cuts down on the search-space. (If total search space is
    2^32, rwin is 16k, effective attack search space is 2^32/16k). Multiplied
    by number of ephemeral ports, it becomes *feasible* but still not very

    > > Inter-provider BGP is long-lived with close to fixed ports, which is
    > > why it has caused quite a stir.
    > Makes sense. What would be the overall effect though? Route flaps?

    > > Nevertheless, number of packets to kill the session is still *large*
    > > (under "best-case" for attacker, you need to send 2^30 packets)...


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.021 / U:1.172 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site