![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 09:22:06AM +0100, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 09:07:12AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > What about other bus types? Do I really need to teach userspace about > > the relationships between all the various bus types we have on ARM and > > how to work out what these relationships are by guessing? > > > > Please. The symlinks are necessary and they are the sole source of > > the relationship information. > > In which case you want them to be associated with target, not the current > pathname of target. And no, I don't buy the "so far all renames happen *here* > and all symlinks are pointing *there*, so we don't care" - that won't last. > > When do we have a legitimate reason for dangling symlinks in sysfs, anyway? Ok, in thinking about it some more, we don't. And I don't have a problem with grabbing the reference to the target anymore either (after looking over the code). So no more objections from me about this :) thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||