![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > A binary module is "considered good" if > > And for which architectures do they have to provide the binary-only part? 22 > and still counting... They don't have to. Otherwise, I guess, for those they want their modules to work on. Again, I am not saying: "under this conditions binary modules will be most welcome in Linux and will be absolutely beneficial". I am just saying, one could try to impose something like this to try to better handle those evil things. If at all... Thanks Guennadi --------------------------------- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. DSA Daten- und Systemtechnik GmbH Pascalstr. 28 D-52076 Aachen Germany - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||