![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 02:17:13PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote: > I tried making this point before, but failed to communicate. Let me try > again. So far as I know, there is no instance in current Linux kernel > code using this cpumask facility that is affected (currently broken) by > the cpumask_arith bugs addressed by Bill's patch. Do you know of any > breakage in other _current_ code caused by these cpumask_arith bugs, > Bill? > As a consequence of my seeing nothing else yet overtly busted by this, > it was, and remains, my recommendation to Bill to hold off on these > patches. Little sense in correcting the semantics of a piece of code > that I expected to remove shortly anyway, if nothing else cared for now. > However, I realize that Bill takes considerable pride in his work, and > would like to see this fixed. It's not worth a big fuss, either way, > so far as I can tell. I thought you were reporting some instance affected by it. Since there's no report of anyone affected by it, and a cleanup/whatever pending, I'm dropping the bugfix patch(es). -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||