![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:22:33AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > Well, I doubt anybody could take advantage of this optimization, since > > nobody can ship with hugetlbfs disabled anyways (peraphs with the > > exception of the embedded people but then I doubt they want to risk > > Common. stop smoking that bad stuff. Almost non-one except the known > oracle whores SuSE and RH need it. Remeber Linux is used much more widely > except the known "Enterprise" vendors. None of the NAS/networking/media > applicances or pdas I've seen has the slightest need for hugetlbfs. The HPC types also love hugetlbfs since it reduces their tlb miss rate. Paul. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||