![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi, On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 11:20, Daniel Fenert wrote: > >> This sounds like memory corruption (which could be caused by a misbehaving > >> driver or by flaky hardware) because transaction->t_ilist is not used at > >> all by the kernel code. Did this box run stable with other kernels? > > > >Sounds like bad memory to me. The only other report of this I've seen > >was at > > > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115935 > > > >and that machine didn't pass memtest86. > > It passed memtest86, 6 or 7 hours, any further hints? Well, 7 hours is often not enough for memtest86, I usually recommend 24 hours if there are signs of bad hardware. But other than that, I can't think of anything ext3-related --- ext3 simply doesn't ever set that flag. If it's being set, something is stomping on ext3's transaction struct. That _could_ be the kernel, but it could be just about anything touching memory after it's freed; or it could be bad hardware. What modules are you using? Is there anything unusual in common between your machine or its use and that in #115935? Rebuilding the kernel to enable slab debugging may well be useful if there's something stomping on transaction structs. Cheers, Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||