[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] radix priority search tree - objrmap complexity fix
    On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:22:33AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > Well, I doubt anybody could take advantage of this optimization, since
    > nobody can ship with hugetlbfs disabled anyways (peraphs with the
    > exception of the embedded people but then I doubt they want to risk

    Common. stop smoking that bad stuff. Almost non-one except the known
    oracle whores SuSE and RH need it. Remeber Linux is used much more widely
    except the known "Enterprise" vendors. None of the NAS/networking/media
    applicances or pdas I've seen has the slightest need for hugetlbfs.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.018 / U:2.644 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site