Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 2 Apr 2004 19:55:08 -0800 | From | Ross Biro <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cowlinks v2 |
| |
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 02:59:20 +0100, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> wrote: > > Erik Andersen wrote: > > > Here's a tricky situation: > > > > > > 1. A file is cowlinked. Then each cowlink is mmap()'d, one per process. > > > > > > 2. At this point both mappings share the same pages in RAM. > > > > > > 3. Then one of the cowlinks is written to... > > > > Using mmap with PROT_WRITE on a cowlink must preemptively > > break the link. > > I forget to mention, they are PROT_READ shared mappings.
Or just also make the page cow and not break the link until someone actually writes to it. Really depends on how you view the performance impact, whether you do cow at the block of inode level, and how much you want to touch (or copy parts of) the mm. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |