lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: disable-cap-mlock
    At some point in the past, I wrote:
    >> Something like this would have the minor advantage of zero core impact.
    >> Testbooted only. vs. 2.6.5-rc3-mm4

    On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:39:23PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > I thought this is what setpcap in init is for?

    Yes, that would be a better answer to this issue. I was largely looking
    to produce an alternative implementation of the same thing with less
    core impact. It looks like it may have been too powerful for its own
    good, which is okay, since I didn't really like the sysctl idea anyway
    (though apparently the thing looks attractive to other people for other
    uses, which I don't really know much about, and am not really pursuing).

    There's a push to fix up the capability issues ongoing that I'm getting
    involved in instead.


    -- wli
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.020 / U:31.408 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site