![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 11:42:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > I confess to being moderately exhasperated at the amount of talk and > patching going on in the bitmap and cpumask areas. So when your patch > floated past with a terse description which was bristling with ifs, buts > and maybes I decided to take a pass. > If you want to send it again, cc'ing your co-conspirators and imparting some > confidence that this darned thing is actually meandering toward a conclusion, > please feel free ;) Quick story is that what I sent is (what I believe) to be the bare minimum change to restore correctnes. I'll start arguing with people to make sure bugfixes start moving and cleanups start waiting. Paul, please remove akpm from the cc: list in future replies until we have come to a consensus and get this nailed down (hopefully ASAP) to a coherent cross-vendor story. What I believe I have sent is the bare minimum change, with no cleanups or semantic changes. If you could review and/or send approval or the like that would be very helpful for the users of small SMP systems who are affected by the bug(s) you reported. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||