[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectIMHO the usability of 2.6
    Tested 2.6.1[-mm#] and 2.6.5[-aa#]:
    inexplicables crashes, mouse, NFS etc.,
    on 2-3 of our 8 Linux machines (0.1-6 years old),
    not usable for production, need five 9 (99.999).
    I don't have logs, always switched back to 2.4.25.

    Starting with AT&T UNIX SVR2 (1986, rock solid),
    later Linux 2.0, then 2.2, then 2.4,
    2.4.17 was the 1st veritable stable 2.4 kernel.
    2.4.25 had an uptime >=33 days before changing
    all machines to 2.4.26. Stable since 1-3 days.

    Feedback only and
    kind regards

    Mario Vanoni, _not_ in lkml!

    PS The standalone 9th M$ machine at job,
    boot each morning,
    some days needs 1-3 reboots on the same day.
    From the view point five 9 a piece of jewellery.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.020 / U:21.132 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site