[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: vmscan.c heuristic adjustment for smaller systems
Marc Singer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 04:51:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>Marc Singer <> wrote:
>>>On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 04:21:25PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>>How on earth can it take half a minute to list /proc?
>>>I've watched the vmscan code at work. The memory pressure is so high
>>>that it reclaims mapped pages zealously. The program's code pages are
>>>being evicted frequently.
>>Which tends to imply that the VM is not reclaiming any of that nfs-backed
> I don't think that's the whole story. They question is why.

swappiness is pretty arbitrary and unfortunately it means
different things to machines with different sized memory.

Also, once you *have* gone past the reclaim_mapped threshold,
mapped pages aren't really given any preference above
unmapped pages.

I have a small patchset which splits the active list roughly
into mapped and unmapped pages. It might hopefully solve your
problem. Would you give it a try? It is pretty stable here.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.037 / U:4.000 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site