lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: NUMA API for Linux
    From
    Date
    On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 04:48, Robin Holt wrote:
    > On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 12:39:15PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > > On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:38:37 -0700
    > > Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com> wrote:
    > > > 2) Rename check_* to mpol_check_*
    > >
    > > I really don't understand why you insist on renaming all my functions?
    > > I like the current naming, thank you.
    > >
    >
    > I like the mpol_ flavors because there is no namespace collision
    > on these. When I look at cscope or any other code analysis tool,
    > I know that the mpol_... functions belong together. Makes
    > investigating other people's code easier.
    >
    > Just my 2 cents,
    > Robin Holt

    That was my motivation. It's not particularly important, especially
    since the functions are all declared static. I just thought they were a
    little more readable when prefixed by mpol_.

    -Matt

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:4.718 / U:0.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site