lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] anobjrmap 9 priority mjb tree
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >
> > Any ideas how we might handle latency from vmtruncate (and
> > try_to_unmap) if using prio_tree with i_shared_lock spinlock?
>
> I've been thinking about that. My rough plan is to go wild, naked and lockless.
> If we arrange things in the correct order, new entries onto the list would

It's quite easy if there's a list - though I'm not that eager to go wild,
naked and lockless with you! But what if there's a prio_tree?

Hugh

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.443 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site