Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:24:20 +0100 | From | viro@parcelfa ... | Subject | Re: [PATCH] umount after bad chdir |
| |
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:13:13PM +0800, raven@themaw.net wrote: > On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 raven@themaw.net wrote: > > > > Mind you, chdir() patch in -mm is broken in a lot of other ways - e.g. > > > it assumes that another thread sharing ->fs with us won't call chdir() > > > in the wrong moment... > > > > Thanks for your interest Al. > > > > I see your point (I think). > > > > If I understand you correctly (please explain if I don't) I need to lock > > the ->fs struct. > > Mmm ... doesn't look much good in the light of Als comment. > > Looks like it's not possible to take the lock for long enough even if I > could. > > Lets have some comments, criticisms or suggestions please.
Why do you need to assign pwd before revalidation? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |