[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] umount after bad chdir
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 wrote:

> > Mind you, chdir() patch in -mm is broken in a lot of other ways - e.g.
> > it assumes that another thread sharing ->fs with us won't call chdir()
> > in the wrong moment...
> Thanks for your interest Al.
> I see your point (I think).
> If I understand you correctly (please explain if I don't) I need to lock
> the ->fs struct.

Mmm ... doesn't look much good in the light of Als comment.

Looks like it's not possible to take the lock for long enough even if I

Lets have some comments, criticisms or suggestions please.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.036 / U:0.868 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site