[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] umount after bad chdir
    On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 wrote:

    > > Mind you, chdir() patch in -mm is broken in a lot of other ways - e.g.
    > > it assumes that another thread sharing ->fs with us won't call chdir()
    > > in the wrong moment...
    > Thanks for your interest Al.
    > I see your point (I think).
    > If I understand you correctly (please explain if I don't) I need to lock
    > the ->fs struct.

    Mmm ... doesn't look much good in the light of Als comment.

    Looks like it's not possible to take the lock for long enough even if I

    Lets have some comments, criticisms or suggestions please.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.020 / U:45.320 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site