![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de) wrote: > Oracle needs this sysctl, I designed it and Ken Chen implemented it. I > guess google also won't dislike it. > > This is a lot simpler than the mlock rlimit and this is people really > need (not the rlimit). The rlimit thing can still be applied on top of > this. This should be more efficient too (besides its simplicity). > > can you apply to mainline? This patch seems like the wrong hack to work around missing mlock rlimit functionality. Wouldn't it be better to fix the core problem, and leave this patch out of mainline? I agree with Rik, such a fix (mlock/rlimit) will make all the gpg users feel warm and fuzzy ;-) thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||